Can Joint Venture Projects Enhance
Physician-Hospital Relationships?
BY ANN HALPREN
Relationships between doctors and hospitals can be amiable
or antagonistic. Many experts believe an era of
increased cooperation is becoming more likely. One of
the closest relationships is shared ownership in a business entity
— a joint venture.
There is little question that roles of doctors and hospitals
are shifting and changing. Not too many years ago, joint ventures
would have been unlikely if not impossible. Today they
are becoming common.
What will the future hold? Thalia
Baker, CMPE, healthcare adviser for
the accounting firm L. Paul Kassouf &
Co, P.C., believes a serious look at the
long-term roles of doctors and hospitals
may offer a key to the answer.
“Right now everybody’s fighting over
the most profitable services. If physicians
owned or had ownership in hospitals,
we wouldn’t be fighting over
where the MRI sits.” She says physicians
are trying to move the services
they use all the time to someplace
where they have ownership.
“Down the road we need to
decide the long-term role of a hospital
versus the long-term role of the physician,”
says Baker. “Regardless of what
we do, the physician is still the driver
of all healthcare. The physician writes
the orders, consults on patients, performs
surgeries, delivers babies. The
hospitals are a facility they use.”
In spite of their basic differences,
more and more hospitals and physicians
are finding innovative ways of
working together, sharing both the
risks and the rewards. Although surgery
centers are the most common
type of joint ventures, anything is possible.”
“A group of physicians can
partner with any clinical service that
has an outpatient component,”
explains Jay Weatherly of Salient
Health Ventures. He cites imaging
centers, pain centers and cardiac cath
labs as examples.
When there is a concerted effort
to bring the parties together, trust is
built. “In a business, professional,
clinical excellence type of project,
there needs to be enough trust that
you are not going to enter this relationship
to hurt me,” says Steve
Nyquist, also of Salient Health Ventures.
Joint ventures must grow from a
sense of trust. Each party must
believe the other does not intend any
harm or negative outcome. “There
also needs to be an even sharing of risk
and reward,” says Nyquist. “That’s
what a collaborative joint venture is all
about. It’s a healthy, even-handed
sharing for the benefit of the project
which ultimately will benefit a community.”
Weatherly and Nyquist usually
advise physicians who are considering
participating in joint ventures to consider
doing it with their hospitals,
even though the two sides bring different
perspectives to the table.
“Hospitals are jumping on joint
ventures, especially in bigger cities,”
says Baker. “I think the hospitals are
doing it primarily to keep the doctors
from taking those services out. If they
don’t offer a joint venture, the doctors
are going to do it without them.”
“It’s not bad for a physician to get
more involved in certain patient care
activities and the ownership of them,”
says Gary Griffin of Gadsden-based
Gary Griffin & Associates. “I work
with several physician groups and hospitals.
They both have advantages to
bring to the table.” He says when both
parties bring advantages the result is a
better enterprise. “Both sides have to
give to make a good deal.”
Hospitals may be in a better position
to generate the kind of funding
needed for a project. “Physicians
sometimes have a problem raising capital,”
says Griffin. He explains that
when physicians undertake a project,
each physician involved must personally
guarantee repayment of loaned
funds for the venture to continue.
Deciding about signing a personal
guarantee makes each physician evaluate
the merits of the project very carefully.
“Sometimes projects break down
at that point, trying to get a group of
doctors to sign guarantees,” says Griffin.
“It is a personal guarantee, not a
practice guarantee. Each physician in
the group must sign because the bank
wants to be sure it’ll get paid.”
Working with a hospital is not the
only way physicians can participate in
joint ventures. Companies that
encourage physicians to work independently
of the hospital have sprung
up in the past few years. These companies
generally encourage doctors to
set themselves up to work as hospital
competitors rather than collaborators.
“That’s the root of why they are competing
for market share,” says Nyquist.
Griffin says physician groups
sometimes refuse to work with a hospital
and they bring in an outside firm
to provide the management for a venture.
“The physicians can get taken
by the percentage of revenue or
expenses that they pay in the contract.
A hospital would nowhere near do
that or would have negotiated so
poorly.”
How does everyone involved get a
fair deal? Working with an objective
outside facilitator often can help. “It
brings a neutralizing effect, providing
an objective way that they can say
their piece,” says Nyquist. “No side
feels like the other is dominating or
manipulating.”
“Use a third party to facilitate
who doesn’t have an ax to grind, who
doesn’t have something to sell to either
side,” recommends Griffin. “That’s a
very effective tool.”
Weatherly says consultants can
serve as catalysts for positive relationships
between physicians and hospitals.
If there is any merit in doing
something together, consultants at
least put the idea out for discussion.
“On many occasions we uncover the
need because we’re being contacted
and asked to help,” says Weatherly.
The idea for a venture can be generated
by a physician, a hospital or an outside
facilitator.
“There may be a lot of proprietary
companies pushing physicians away
from hospitals,” says Weatherly. “We
identify the merits of working with
the hospital, then help establish a
pathway for doing that.”
Nyquist believes physicians
should look at all the options before
initiating any project — including
working with a hospital. When considering
any project, consider more
than just reimbursement. Compliance
matters and legal matters also can
be critical.
“For hospitals, we encourage that
they be willing to listen to their physicians
and embrace them as partners
rather than seeing them as competitors
or as hindrances in running their
hospitals,” says Nyquist. “They need
to hear the doctors and respond to
them, not just have meetings.”
This article taken from the November 2005 issue of the Birmingham Medical News.